The Amero - The Presidency and CFR

So what are Obama's and McCain's views on the amero currency and the NAU?

Obama and McCain are members of the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations)
The CFR is said to be for the abolishment of sovereignty and their stance on most issues are pro-New World Order. The Amero Currency fits the CFR agenda.

John McCain says that democracies around the world should join with NATO to forge "a new global order of peace", he has no exit plan for Iraq and probably would continue to expand war in the middle east.

John McCain's amnesty bill which was defeated would of lead to even more open borders. The bill fits perfectly with the policies of the CFR. With McCain as president expect Amnesty by 2010 and a fast track for the Amero Currency.

Senator Obama states, “I don’t know if I’m an official member. I’ve spoken there before. It’s basically just a forum where a bunch of people [waves his hand] talk about foreign policy.” For a candidate so committed in an election so heavily dependent on views on foreign relations and diplomacy, I’m surprised he waves off the mention of “a bunch of people talking foreign policy.” Aren’t you?

There are members of the CFR, senator. You should know, because your wife, Michelle Obama, is on the board of directors of the Chicago committee for the CFR. (Do a page search for: Michelle Obama): http://www.ccfr.org/chicago_council_board_directors.php).
He doesn’t address this part of the question at all.

He stumbles over the “North American Uuuuunion” and follows by stating, “I see no evidence of this taking place.” In my first Amero Watch post, Lou Dobbs outlines George W. Bush’s policies that have been put into action by the signing of a formal agreeement. Do you not know about this, Senator Obama? And no, this wasn’t reported on Fox News. As reported, Bush signed the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America without the approval of Congress or the American people. Shouldn’t this be something you’re on top of, Senator? Something that critics have called, NAFTA on Steroids. ?

Still not convinced that something is going on behind closed doors?

Get a load of this:

According to the wikipedia entry for North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), signed into action by Bill Clinton on January 1, 1994:

“While different groups advocate for a further integration into a North American Community, sensitive issues have hindered that process. The three countries have pursued different trade policies with non-members (for example, Mexico has signed FTAs with more than 40 countries in 12 agreements), making the possibility of creating a customs union difficult to accomplish. Former President Vicente Fox of Mexico had promoted the idea of enhancing NAFTA (into what he labeled “NAFTA-Plus”, or possibly a North American Community), but after the September 11, 2001 attacks, priorities in the United States changed. The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America was signed, instead, as a separate and unrelated agreement.

Furthermore:

“In an interview with Larry King on October 8, 2007, Vicente Fox described any plans for a North American single currency as a “Long term, very long term” proposal. He also spoke of his and U.S. President George W. Bush’s support for the Free Trade Area of the Americas as a “first step” toward “a new vision” for the Americas, like we are trying to do with NAFTA,” but then said that Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez had decided to ‘destroy the idea’.”

Now take a look at this from BBC News: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4359386.stm

Venezuela’s President, Hugo Chavez, says he is in possession of intelligence showing that the United States plans to invade his country.

Chavez says, “A coup happened in Venezuela that was prepared by the US. What do they want? Our oil, as they did in Iraq?” Well, maybe they want something more… Maybe Chavez just another obstacle to this new vision of the America’s, and eventually the world.

Obama states “I was opposed to NAFTA.” According to columnist James Travers, “Multiple sources say the Canadian note questioning the Democrat front-runner’s public promise to reopen NAFTA was leaked from the Prime Minister’s Office to a Republican contact before it made American headline news.”

Indeed it did, as CNN reports, “The AP obtained a memo from a Canadian diplomat saying an Obama adviser had told Canada’s government the candidate’s criticism of NAFTA was “more about political positioning than a clear articulation of policy plans.”

Take a look at a statement published on the CFR website by Richard N. Haass: (http://www.cfr.org/publication/9903/sovereignty_and_globalisation.html)

“Globalisation thus implies that sovereignty is not only becoming weaker in reality, but that it needs to become weaker. States would be wise to weaken sovereignty in order to protect themselves, because they cannot insulate themselves from what goes on elsewhere. Sovereignty is no longer a sanctuary.”
-Richard N. Haass, President, Council on Foreign Relations, Feb 17, 2006

At that town hall meeting, no one even uttered the word “conspiracy”, Senator Obama. It came from your mouth, not that crazy theorist in the audience.

Here is a short video that will spark your interest.

If you still feel like this is all a conspiracy theory look at the offical CFR website on the Amero


Well, what about Ron Paul, whose views are strongly libertarian, often stresses his unwillingness to vote for any bill that is not “expressly authorized by the Constitution.” He was the only Republican member of Congress running for president who did not vote to authorize the Iraq war in 2002. He remains critical of U.S. involvement in the region and says the war “was sold to us with false information.” Paul’s campaign focuses on typical libertarian issues: small government, lower taxes, free market policies, and non-interventionism abroad.